I have a question about the URLs in relation to search engines, which always have the extension as the file extension.
https://www.example.com/album/IMG001.JPG
This URL looks like it's leading to a JPG file. But it leads to a webpage. Do not recognize the search engine as a fake?
The additional file extension .html or .php I find ugly.
https://www.example.com/album/IMG001.JPG.php
Is the file extension really that important? The path to the file is in the URL. It could just be that two files with the same name and different file extensions are stored in the same folder. How often does this happen?
I do not want to hear now that it is OK, but like to be shown sources that it is not a problem. Especially for search engine ranking.
Plus theme: URL encoding?